PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL, PERILAKU KERJA INOVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA TUGAS DI LPMP PROVINSI BANTEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55171/.v8i3.565Abstract
This study aims to find factors that can explain task performance at LPMP Provinsi Banten. The analysis was carried out by examining the effect of transformational and transactional leadership, work behavior, and work innovation on task performance. The research approach used a quantitative survey from a total population of 87 people. 72 samples came from LPMP employees of Provinsi Banten. An interesting finding from this study is the partial and simultaneous effect of the dependent and independent variables. Simultaneous testing by paying attention to the R Square value of 0.540, means that simultaneously the effect of transformational and transactional leadership, work behavior, and work innovation on task performance is 54% while the remaining 46% is influenced by other factors outside of this research model. These results conclude that simultaneously and partially, transformational and transactional leadership, work behavior, and work innovation can be used as predictor variables for task performance. The findings show that leaders must realize that increasing transformational leadership styles, work behavior, work innovation will help improve employee task performance by providing motivation, providing equal opportunities, competency-based training, strengthening the sense of kinship among employees, bringing people together with suitable jobs and positions. , provides clarity of tasks and targets that must be achieved and encourages employees to work actively by providing rewards for outstanding employees. This method will boost the morale of other employees to make the best achievements for the Institute.References
Alrowwad, A., Abualoush, S. H., & Masa’deh, R. (2020). Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0062
Armstrong, M. (2009). Performance management processes. In Armstrong’s handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822adba3
Arumugam, T., Rahman, A., Maideen, M., & Arumugam, S. (2019). Examining the effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on employee satisfaction in conglomerate companies. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(5).
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
Bhatti, S. H., Zakariya, R., Vrontis, D., Santoro, G., & Christofi, M. (2020). High-performance work systems, innovation and knowledge sharing: An empirical analysis in the context of project-based organizations. Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2019-0403
Blickle, G., & Schütte, N. (2017). Trait psychopathy, task performance, and counterproductive work behavior directed toward the organization. Personality and Individual Differences, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.006
Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014528478
Carlos, V. S., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2016). Development and Validation of a Self-Reported Measure of Job Performance. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0883-z
Cobblah, M. A., & van der Walt, T. B. (2017). Staff training and development programmes and work performance in the university libraries in Ghana. Information Development, 33(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916665234
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdh.22
Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). The effect of state core self-evaluations on task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour, and counterproductive work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1063486
Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Do, H., & Shipton, H. (2019). High-performance work systems and innovation in Vietnamese small firms. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619863572
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x
Ivancevich, J. M., Matteson, M. T., & Konopaske, R. (2014). Organizational Organizational Behavior and Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Juliansyah Noor. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Igarss 2014.
Lai, F. Y., Tang, H. C., Lu, S. C., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. C. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899085
LPMP Banten. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tahun 2019.
Luhgiatno, L., & Dwiatmadja, C. (2020). Developing optimal distinctive open innovation in private universities: Antecedents and consequences on innovative work behavior and employee performance. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p19
Mahdinezhad, M., Suandi, T. Bin, Silong, A. D., & Omar, Z. B. (2013). Transformational, transactional leadership styles and job performance of academic leaders. International Education Studies, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p29
Mahlamäki, T., Rintamäki, T., & Rajah, E. (2019). The role of personality and motivation on key account manager job performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 83(February), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.013
Mahomed, F. E., & Rothmann, S. (2020). Strength use, training and development, thriving, and intention to leave: the mediating effects of psychological need satisfaction. South African Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246319849030
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2010). Human Resource Management (13th ed.).
McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. Von. (2018). Organizational Behavior Emerging Knowledge. Global Reality (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Rasheed, M. I., Humayon, A. A., Awan, U., & Ahmad, A. ud D. (2014). Factors affecting teachers’ motivation: An HRM challenge for public sector higher educational institutions of Pakistan (HEIs). International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216
Rotundo, M. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66
Shaaban, S., & Shehata, M. S. M. (2019). The impact of resilience on performance under transformational and transactional leadership. Organizational Cultures, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-8013/CGP/v19i02/33-46
Shahzad, K., Arenius, P., Muller, A., Rasheed, M. A., & Bajwa, S. U. (2019). Unpacking the relationship between high-performance work systems and innovation performance in SMEs. Personnel Review, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2016-0271
Yang, C. L., & Hwang, M. (2014). Personality traits and simultaneous reciprocal influences between job performance and job satisfaction. Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-09-2011-0079
Zhang, J., Bal, P. M., Akhtar, M. N., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. (2019). High-performance work system and employee performance: the mediating roles of social exchange and thriving and the moderating effect of employee proactive personality. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12199
