About the Journal

Focus and Scope

"The Asia Pacific of Management Studies (APJMS)" is intended to serve the reader with relevant field of study, with the dissemination of research results, and covers all disciplines related to the study of every aspect of accounting and business (economics). The Asia Pacific of Management Studies is expected to give readers the latest research findings related to accounting and business studies.

Articles published in journals should:
  1. Manuscripts in the fields of accounting and business management (business: marketing management, financial management, human resource management, strategic management, operations management).
  2. Writing a manuscripts can be accessed by business scholars, researchers, consultants, students and practitioners.
  3. Writing follow the rules of scientific criteria.
  4. Characteristically analytical and originality.
  5. The problem is the issues in Indonesia and globally that have a significant impact on the contribution to the development of business accounting studies in Indonesia..
  6. The text of manuscripts submitted in the form of the original journal and do not violate existing copyright.

Peer Review Process

Manuscript will be reviewed based on the following rules:

  1. Originality of manuscripts submitted to publishing.
  2. Methodologies and theories used in accordance with the topic.
  3. In-depth analysis.
  4. Writing rules in accordance with the terms scientific criteria\
  5. Double Blind Peer Review

Publication Frequency

Three times a year, namely April, August, and December.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Statement of scientific code of ethics is a statement of code of ethics for all parties involved in the publication process of this scientific journal, namely managers, editors, bestari partners, and authors / writers. This statement of ethics code for scientific publications is based on the Head of LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which in essence upholds three ethical values in publications, namely (i) Neutrality, ie free from conflicting interests in managing publications; (ii) Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled as authors / writers; and (iii) Honesty, i.e. free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Section A: Publication and authorship 
  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 
Section B: Authors’ responsibilities
  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 
Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities
  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 
Section D: Editors’ responsibilities
  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
The papers published in  REGISTER JOURNAL will be consider to retract in the publication if :
  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

Author Fees

Article Publishing Fees:

Since December 2021 this journal charges author fees as follows.
The Article Processing Fee of the original paper in this journal is 500,000.00 (IDR) (for Indonesian authors) & $0 (for Foreign authors). If the paper is accepted for publication.
Accepted manuscripts will not be published until payment has been received. The method of payment is through Direct Deposit from any bank to our bank account. Account number, will be sent to the author's email with LOA. If the author has sent, please send the receipt to lppmstieltm@gmail.com.