EKONOMI MANAJERIAL SEBAGAI KERANGKA INTEGRATIF PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN: RUANG LINGKUP, BATASAN, DAN PERSPEKTIF LINTAS DISIPLIN

Authors

  • Puri Rohmatulloh Universitas La Tansa Mashiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55171/apjms.v13i2.1845

Abstract

Managerial economics is an interdisciplinary field that integrates economic principles with theories and methods of decision-making to assist managers in allocating scarce resources efficiently under conditions of uncertainty, information constraints, and changing business environments. However, managerial decision-making cannot be adequately understood from an economic perspective alone, as managerial choices are also shaped by behavioral, organizational, financial, strategic, and institutional factors. This article aims to analyze the scope and limitations of managerial economics and examine its relationship with other theories and disciplines that contribute to managerial decision-making. The analysis adopts a conceptual approach based on a literature review of managerial economics, decision theory, microeconomics, strategic management, and organizational behavior. The analysis indicates that managerial economics provides a strong analytical framework for evaluating alternatives, incentives, costs, benefits, risks, and efficiency, but its explanatory and practical capacity is constrained when decisions involve subjective preferences, bounded rationality, incomplete information, organizational dynamics, and institutional or political considerations. Therefore, the effectiveness of managerial economics does not depend on the isolated application of economic principles but on their integration with decision theory and complementary management perspectives. The article highlights the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to translating economic analysis into managerial decisions that are more context-sensitive, adaptive, and accountable.

References

Bresciani, S., Huarng, K.-H., Malhotra, A., & Ferraris, A. (2021). Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 128, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.003

Cameron, K. (1986). A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors. Management Science, 32(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.1.87

Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M. M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.053

Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23463682

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130904

Elbanna, S., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Gherib, J. (2011).

Managerial decision-making in international business: A forty-five-year retrospective. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 135–142.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.001

Falk, T., Hammerschmidt, M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2010). The service quality–satisfaction link revisited: Exploring asymmetries and dynamics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0152-2

George, G., Haas, M. R., McGahan, A. M., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., & Tracey, P. (2023). Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1841–1865. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450

George, G., Haas, M. R., McGahan, A. M., Schillebeeckx, S. J. D., & Tracey, P. (2022). Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1845–1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450

Gusni, (2015). Topik 1 : Sifat dan Ruang Lingkup Ekonomi Manajerial, 2-5. Diunduh dari www.academia.edu pada tanggal 5 Desember 2018.

Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., & others. (2023). The heuristics and biases of top managers: Past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 60(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12937

Hsu, Y.-L., & Reid, G. C. (2021). Two-stage decision-making within the firm: Analysis and case studies. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(6), 1355–1373. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3317

Jones, B. D. (1999).

Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 297–321.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.297

Kunc, M. H., & Morecroft, J. D. W. (2010). Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1164–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.858

Lejarraga, T., Frey, R., Schnitzler, C., & Schnitzler, C. (2020). Bounded rationality: Cognitive limitations or adaptation to the environment? The implications of ecological rationality for management learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(3), 357–379.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0189

Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23464011

Levinthal, D. A., & Wu, B. (2010). Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 780–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.845

Mittal, V., Han, K., Frennea, C., Blut, M., Shaik, M., Bosukonda, N., & Sridhar, S. (2023). Customer satisfaction, loyalty behaviors, and firm financial performance: What 40 years of research tells us. Marketing Letters, 34, 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09671-w

Morrison, A. D., & Mota, R. (2023). A theory of organizational purpose. Academy of Management Review, 48(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0307

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499

Ostroff, C., & Schmitt, N. (1993). Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1345–1361. https://doi.org/10.5465/256814

Otto, A. S., Szymanski, D. M., & Varadarajan, R. (2020). Customer satisfaction and firm performance: Insights from over a quarter century of empirical research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00657-7

Pappas, James L., & Hirschey, Mark. (1993). Ekonomi Manajerial. Binarupa Aksara: Jakarta.

Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968

Rubin, P. H., & Dnes, A. W. (2010). Managerial economics: A forward looking assessment. Managerial and Decision Economics, 31(8), 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1509

Stoelhorst, J. W. (2023). Value, rent, and profit: A stakeholder resource-based theory. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3280

W, Tri Eti T. (2016). Bab 1 : Pengertian Ekonomi Manajerial, 2-3. Diunduh dari www.academia.edu pada tanggal 7 Desember 2018.

Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.280

Wilkinson, N. (2005). Managerial economics: A problem-solving approach. Cambridge University Press.

Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.192967

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

Issue

Section

Artikel