Bagaimana Memimpin Milenial: Tinjauan Teori Kepemimpinan Utama
Abstrak
Milenial saat ini mengambil alih tenaga kerja global. Sementarapraktisi dan cendekiawan telah mengakui nilai kerja mereka yangberbeda dari generasi sebelumnya, penelitian tentang topik inimasih langka. Selain itu, teori kepemimpinan saat ini cenderungberfokus terutama pada karakteristik pemimpin tanpa memeriksasecara memadai gaya kepemimpinan yang paling cocok untukgenerasi milenial. Menggunakan tinjauan literatur dari jurnalkepemimpinan tingkat atas, makalah ini bertujuan untukmemberikan kerangka yang lebih komprehensif untukmemberikan arah baru bagi pengembangan teori kepemimpinandengan memahami perspektif generasi milenial tentangkepemimpinan. Dengan demikian, studi ini berkontribusi padaliteratur saat ini dengan menggunakan lima kelompokkepemimpinan tematik untuk mengembangkan gayakepemimpinan yang paling optimal untuk memimpin Milenial.Keuntungan dan kerugian menggunakan neo-karismatik,kepemimpinan dan pemrosesan informasi, pertukaransosial/kepemimpinan relasional, kepemimpinan etis/moral, danteori e-leadership dalam memimpin milenium dinilai. Hasilpenelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada satu pun teorikepemimpinan yang memadai untuk memimpin kaum milenialsecara optimal. Oleh karena itu, disarankan untuk mencampurdimensi kelompok teori kepemimpinan yang berbeda. Adapunaspek teori kepemimpinan, disarankan kepada para peneliti untukmempertimbangkan mengembangkan model teori kepemimpinanyang lebih fleksibel yang dapat mengakomodasi kelompokgenerasi yang berbeda.Referensi
Ahmad. (2021). Kepercayaan Pada Pemimpin Upaya Meningkatkan Organizational Citizenship
Behavior. The Indonesian Journal of Management and Accounting, 9(1), 27–36.
Ahmad, A. (2022). Romantika Kepemimpinan, Efikasi Diri dan Inisiatif Diri Upaya Meningkatkan
Motivasi Kepemimpinan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 981–987.
https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/3039%0Ahttps://www.jptam.org/index.p
hp/jptam/article/download/3039/2549
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A. & Buckley, M. R., 2017. What works for you may not
work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The
Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), p. 245 –260.
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. & Baker, B., 2014. E-Leadership: Re-examining transformations
in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 105-131.
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W.
L. & E. Guler, C., 2016. A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test
for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 634-652.E-
Bowen, Glenn A., 2009. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research
Journal, 9(2), p. 27–40.
Burns, J. M., 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Chen, P.-J. & Choi, Y., 2008. Generational differences in work values: a study of hospitality
management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(6), pp. 595-
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L. & Meuser, J. D., 2014. Leadership theory and research in
the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership
Quarterly, 25(1), p. 36–62.
Dulin, L., 2008. Leadership preferences of a generation Y cohort: A mixed-methods investigation.
Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(1), p. 43–59.
Faller, M. & Gogek, J., 2019. Break from the Past: Survey Suggests Modern Leadership Styles
Needed for Millennial Nurses. Nurse Leader, 17(2), pp. 135-140.
Fry, L. W., 2003. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), pp. 693-
Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M., 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of
leader- member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level
multi domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), pp. 219-247.
Graybill, J. O., 2014. Millennials among the Professional Workforce in Academic Libraries: Their
Perspective on Leadership. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), p. 10–15.
Gursoy, D., Maier, T. A. & C. G. C., 2008. Generational differences: An examination of work
values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 27(3), p. 448 –458.
Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F., 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic
test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), pp. 755-768.
Klimkiewicz, K. & Oltra, V., 2017. Does CSR enhance employer attractiveness? The role of
millennial job seekers’ attitudes. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 24(5), pp. 449-463.
Lloyd, K. J., Boer, D. & Voelpel, S. C., 2015. From listening to leading: Toward an understanding
of supervisor listening within the framework of leader-member exchange theory. International
Journal of Business Communication, 54(4), pp. 431-451.
Lord, R., Foti, R. & Vader, C. D., 1984. A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure,
information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 34(3), pp. 343-378.
Offermann, L. R. & Coats, M. R., 2018. Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over
two decades. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 513-522.
Omilion-Hodges, L. M. & Sugg, C. E., 2019. Millennials’ Views and Expectations Regarding the
Communicative and Relational Behaviors of Leaders: Exploring Young Adults’ Talk About
Work. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82(1), pp. 74-100.
PR Newswire Association LLC, 2012. Boomers Say Convenience is King, Millennials Focus on Self
Identity - What's a Brand to Do?: Continuum of Cool research reveals Millennial/Boomer
attitudes towards leading retail brands. New York: PR Newswire.
Rudolpha, C. W., Rauvolaa, R. S. & Zacherb, H., 2018. Leadership and generations at work: A
critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), p. 44–57.
Stewart, J. S., Oliver, E. G., Cravens, K. S. & Oishi, S., 2017. Managing millennials: Embracing
generational differences. Business Horizons, 60(1), pp. 45-54.
Sy, T., 2010. What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences
of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
(2), pp. 73-84.
J. & Lance, C. E., 2010. Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values
increasing, social and intrinsic. Journal of Management, 36(5), p. 1117 –1142.
Walumbwa, F. et al., 2008. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based
measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), pp. 89-126.
Weeks, K. P. & Schaffert, C., 2019. Generational differences in definitions of meaningful work: A
mixed methods study. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), pp. 1045-1061.
Winograd, M. & Hais, M., 2014. How Millennials Could Upend Wall Street and Corporate America,
Washington: Brookings Institution.
